Hi Thomas The next release will be SVG 1.2, right? In that case, no, just fix it in the trunk. It's not that we have a major legal problem here. It's mostly a documentation problem and can IMO be fixed for the next release. In case you need to do a bugfix release from the SVG 1.1 branch then it would be good to change that there, too.
On 16.07.2005 12:21:13 Thomas DeWeese wrote: > Hi Jeremias, > > All this sounds pretty good to me. Do we want/need to > do anything with the svg11 branch? I may need to keep that > alive at least until there is an official batik svg12 release. > > Jeremias Maerki wrote: > > One more thing. You're right. XPath is not in JAXP 1.3. And so are a few > > other of those subpackages (html, css, traversal, stylesheets etc.). The > > list of packages included in JAXP 1.3 is attached to the proposed plan I > > sent earlier. > > So where will they land? xml-apis-ext.jar? > > > On 16.07.2005 11:25:57 Cameron McCormack wrote: > > > >>The DOM 3 XPath interfaces aren't part of JAXP > >>1.3, are they? Does this make a difference? Jeremias Maerki --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
