DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40862>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40862 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-11-02 17:02 ------- (In reply to comment #3) > So the xml:base attribute is used to identify the base URI to resolve > relative URL's against. To be honest it is a little unclear to me what > should happen for a href that consists only of a fragment identifier > however reading section 4.2 of http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2396.txt > leads me to believe that Batik's behavior is in error. Any other > opinions? Are we really supposed to tread just fragment identifiers > as a special case? Hmm, the wording in 4.2 about "if the URI reference occurs in a context that is always intended to result in a new request" is a bit dodgy, but I would guess that paint server references aren't always intended to result in a new request. So since it says that if the URI reference has no URI in it, then it's a "same-document" reference, I agree that the current beahviour is a bug. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
