Hi Cameron, Jeremias,
Jeremias Maerki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 11/17/2006 03:50:53 AM:
> On 15.11.2006 10:47:38 Cameron McCormack wrote:
> > I?d like to reorganise the directories in the repo a bit, to be more
> > like fop?s (src, src/java, src/java-1.3, src/java-1.4,
> > src/documentation, src/resources, test, test/java, test/resources,
> > test/references, test/reports). It?ll be a bit neater, I think.
Well, I'm not that fond of it (the src/java bit always get's to
me, what else are we going to have? ;) but I don't really care. So if
you prefer it go ahead.
BTW what goes in src/documentation?
> I support that. And maybe src/external for the W3C sources if the way
> through XML Commons is not doable.
> How about not bundling Ant anymore? This is considered best practice. At
> least I've read that somewhere a long time ago but I can't find the
> reference.
I for one like bundling ant, especially since I don't think it's
true that everyone has ant installed (especially 'beginners').
> you can cut back on the distribution size like that. XML Graphics
> Commons also doesn't bundle Ant.
Well we already make a 'binary' dist that doesn't include ant.
If you are getting the source dist the .5MB ant is swamped by the
test-references part of the tree.
> And what about the switch to Forrest? How far is that?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
