disregard my comment...removal of he additional attribute shows the same problem.
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 6:11 PM, jonathan wood <[email protected]>wrote: > > I think maybe test_good.svg is a bad reference...the (second) style > attribute of the rect tag is dangling? > > <flowRegion> > <rect y="0" x="0" width="128" height="128" > style="stroke:none;fill:none"/> > style="fill:none;stroke:none" /> > </flowRegion> > > > > On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 6:01 PM, David Wimsey <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Again, attachment ... I should quit now. >> >> >> >> >> On May 6, 2010, at 5:57 PM, David Wimsey wrote: >> >> > It would appear that if I create a flowRoot with the required flowRegion >> and a flowPara (which seems to be allowed by my interpretation of the spec, >> Am I reading it wrong?) no text is rendered. >> > >> > If I nest the flowPara inside a flowDiv first, it works fine, which also >> is fine according to the spec. >> > >> > The real problem for me comes down to the fact that Inkscape doesn't >> seem to output the flowDiv, where as the other editors we've been using in >> the past do. I was tracking down the various bits of info to submit it as a >> bug to Inkscape but the spec seems to indicate the bug is in Batik. >> > >> > Anyone have any thoughts as to fixing this? Doesn't seem like it should >> be too much of a fix for someone with knowledge of the internals, or is >> there a reason that it works like it does? >> > >> > Note: The spec I'm refering to is: >> http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-SVG12-20041027/flow.html Again, feel free >> to correct me if I'm wrong. >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> > >> > >> >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> > >
