Those who monitor gene...@xmlgraphics.apache.org will have seen that I'm working (among other things) on ICC named color support for FOP and Batik. I have now a first version that supports cielab() and icc-named-color() functions from the SVG Color 1.2 Working Draft: http://www.w3.org/TR/SVGColor12
The code relies on changes in XML Graphics Commons which are currently placed in a dev branch and which are also used by a dev branch for FOP: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/xmlgraphics/commons/branches/Temp_Color https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/xmlgraphics/fop/branches/Temp_Color So adding this to Batik will finally add that dependency on XML Graphics Commons which we have talked about long ago. Adding support for the remaining methods from SVG Color 1.2 won't be all that hard. There's cielch() that requires a formula to convert the values to CIE Lab. And finally, the device-specific colors which also be fairly easy with a little additional work in XML Graphics Commons. The question is now, if it were ok, if I created a similar branch for Batik and upload my changes there for everyone to review. I'm not technically a Batik committer although I theoretically have write access to the Batik repo since I'm a PMC member. That's why I'm asking what the best course of action is. I can also post a patch if that's preferred. Jeremias Maerki --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: batik-dev-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: batik-dev-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
