the junit work involves pretty much all classes, so indeed it would cause a big problem to integrate
On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 3:06 AM, Luis Bernardo <[email protected]> wrote: > > Glenn, regarding BATIK-1098, which has to do with cyclic dependencies > between jars, the approach I followed was to move classes between packages > to break the dependencies (the other approach would be to cut on the number > of batik jars, which are indeed too many, and merge some of them). This > involved moving a lot of classes in the packages with dom.svg, bridge, > anim, script and gvt in the name. But I am afraid now that this may cause > major problems with your work when you try to merge to trunk... > > What are the batik packages where you are doing your work? > > > On 12/22/14 9:28 AM, Luis Bernardo wrote: > > OK, since the goal is really to release FOP 2.0 then I will not cut a RC > now. But I will fix BATIK-1098. > > On 12/21/14 11:57 PM, Glenn Adams wrote: > > There are two items underway that I'd like to be finished before we cut a > release: > > - BATIK-1092 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BATIK-1092> > - BATIK-1095 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BATIK-1095> > - FOP-2391 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-2391> > > At a minimum, the Batik work involved in the last one of these needs to be > finished before we do an FOP 2.0. > > On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 4:40 PM, Luis Bernardo <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> >> >> Hi everyone, >> >> I am planning to push for a Batik release in the coming weeks so that we >> can aim to also have a release of FOP in the near future. The recent >> release of XGC was part of this goal. >> >> I am currently working on BATIK-1098 which I think needs to be fixed >> before a release can be considered. After that I plan to build a release >> candidate and give users some weeks to test before building the final >> release. Since I do not see any reason to bump the major version I plan to >> name the release 1.8. >> >> In terms of new features the only thing really new compared with 1.7 will >> be the SVG1.2 color support added by Jeremias. All the rest are bug fixes. >> >> Let me know if you have any comments/suggestions/objections. >> >> Luis >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> > > >
