Jens, > Jens von Pilgrim wrote: > > Hello, > > I've got some trouble with lots of different package versions... > Batik (1.1rc4) uses (as far as I can see) the following libraries: > > - js.jar > - crimson-parser.jar > > Unfortunately these jars don't contain a manifest with package version > > infos, so I don't know which version batik uses. Since I probably need > > crimson-parser twice (another library needs it too) I will get > problems with different versions maybe. > > What versions are used in batik 1.1rc4?
You are asking for the js or crimson version in the project they come from, right? js.jar is Rhino15R2 I think Stephane will be able to tell you which version of Crimson we are using. > > And, addressed to the developers, it it possible to add version infos > in > batik's manifest file (using package version identification)? > And, > perhaps, > is it possible to rename in future releases of batik the required 3rd > party libraries including their version, like batik-1.1.jar or > something like this? A wonderful solution would be if all xml.apache > projects would include a package version identification... Point well taken for the manifest: I have added an RFE for that (Bug #5044). About the jar, I am not sure. This said, we do that for ant (we use ant_1_4_1.jar). This has value, but one drawback is that you need to update your scripts/batch files every time a new version comes up. Anybody has comments, ideas on this? Thanks for your feedback. Cheers, Vincent. > > Jens > ____________________________________________________________ > Jens von Pilgrim > 4flow AG > Berlin, Germany --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
