At 07:00 PM 2/1/2004 +0100, Chris Lilley wrote:
On Wednesday, January 28, 2004, 8:18:46 PM, Thomas wrote:
TD> Chris Lilley wrote:
>> On Monday, January 26, 2004, 9:55:45 PM, Thomas wrote:
>> TD> While we are on this topic and I have your ear, I might mention
>> TD> that I've been made extremely cautious of investing any effort
>> TD> in implementing features from 1.2 since the changes that were
>> TD> introduced to the multi-resolution support.
[snip]
However, your point above seemed to be more general, about SVG 1.2 as
a whole, so I was merely trying to clarify whether you had ceased
implementing all 1.2 features because of churn or because you were
unsatisfied with one particular feature.
TD> yes I consider the changes detrimental, the new formulation
TD> will be harder to author correctly, and _much_ harder to implement.
So you said. Your comments, along with other folks comments, will of
course be taken into account.
I would really like to see the details on why the new formulation is harder to
implement and author. It certainly seems much, much easier to me than the
old one - on both implementation and authoring side.
Peter Sorotokin
SVG development
Adobe Systems Inc.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
