I have mouse events in my tests. I don't think there are a lot, but things run slow. I have found that Batik runs slower that the Adobe plugin. I thought both Batik and the Adobe plugin used rhino for JavaScript. I am learning how to use Java so I can compare using Java and using JavaScript speed.
so many interesting projects - 24 hours in the day...
Gary
Richard Harris wrote:
Hi, I have made some progress on solving performance issues. A control-break at a time of high cpu usage indicated that it was painting (actually doing clipping processing). My experience so far is that the javascript is fast, but that painting (when nested clipPaths are used too heavily) and mouse tracking (when there are lots of mouse sensitive objects, or when the mouse sensitive objects make heavy use of clipping) is slow. I have found that changes that improve Batik's processing speed seem to also improve Adobe's speed.
Rick
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
