Bob Tarling wrote: > That's very useful.Thank you. > > > Still > 700kb, which seems a lot for the task at hand. But better than > > having to write, test and deploy my own :-) > Yes, larger than my entire application. I wonder if the developers may > consider repackaging based on a functional breakdown. I suspect there may be > many others using batik for this purpose alone.
Here's a crazy and untested idea.. run your application (ALL of it) with java -verbose:class to get a print out of every class loaded by the JVM. Parse this list and use it to build a JAR file containing only & exactly the files you need for your app. -Archie __________________________________________________________________________ Archie Cobbs * CTO, Awarix * http://www.awarix.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
