Hi Thomas,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 01/26/2007 08:52:51 AM:
> Today I've downloaded a svn-snapshot of batik from 01-25-2007
> because this version seems to be far more memory efficient with
> embedded images than the one I used till today (also a snappshot
> from 10-04-2005).
I'm a little surprised by that but....
> My question is if anyone knows if there's a version where the
> memory improvement has been made but the bug described above is not
> present. Or does anyone know any other way to prevent this exception.
I believe that exception should be fixed, please report back if
it is not.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
