Helder Magalhães:
> These are good news! :-) Could I add Batik's XHR support as "underway"
> in the SVG implementations Viewer Matrix [1] ("Communication" row) or
> is it just too soon? ;-)Well I probably won’t get time to work on it for a while (at least a few months), so I think it would be premature to mention. > At least temporarily (I hope), I had to stall my XHR experiments > regarding Web browser applet integration... :-( > > I've stated something related in a SVG-WG mailing list thread [2] (and > in some IRC sparkles), where I strongly feel that making the > communication methods homogeneous for SVG would potentially cause an > SVG implementations deployment boost. XHR support by Batik would > surely be a helper here. Weirdly enough, at least for me, my post [2] > hasn't received any feedback to date. Probably I'll ping the SVG-WG > mailing list in a few weeks as I'd love to see an official position on > this (high priority, IMO) subject. :-) I agree that it is good to have consistency across implementations! Now, I think that Batik’s getURL() won’t quite match the requirements in 1.2T, but it should be good enough for casual use, and I know that people do use it. I think having XHR implemented also will make it easier for people coming from AJAX in an HTML browser world. -- Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
