Would you mind checking if you have a similar memory consumption if you install FOP 0.95 and run: fop -imagein myimage.svg -pdf myimage.jpg ??? I'm asking since you might be running on older code that might not efficiently process JPEG images.
I guess it also depends what you're doing with the JPEG image. If it is run through filter operations the JPEG image has to be decoded in memory. If not it should theoretically not load the JPEG file into memory but efficiently pass it into the PDF undecoded. However, if it has a color profile, that could use up some memory. On 04.11.2008 13:19:26 Lars Eirik Rønning wrote: > Hi.When i try to render a pdf from batik using jpg images of high quality > the memory consumption is extremely high. > I tested this now with a 12mp image (4000*3000). > In order to have this output the pdf correctly with the pdftranscoder it > needs almost 600mb. > > Any way of improving this? > > Thanks guys, Batik rocks. Jeremias Maerki --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
