no wonder why we have issues with 10 approximately 8mb files on one pdf page then..;)
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 9:37 PM, Jeremias Maerki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > Of course, base64 requires more memory. The whole file is encoded in the > URL and due to the encoding the file uses even more bytes (roughly 1.25 > times) than the raw original file. The whole URL is stored as a single > java.lang.String in memory and gets passed around. base64 is nice for > smaller files that can be embedded. It doesn't make much sense for > larger images IMO. > > On 13.11.2008 21:32:39 Lars Eirik Rønning wrote: > > ok, thanks.Does embedding base64 require more memory than if referencing > > only a file path? > > Thanks , we are in the middle of a project and utilize fop a lot.. It > great! > <snip/> > > > > Jeremias Maerki > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
