John C. Turnbull: > False alarm. OK, I've also made a few more tests, this time involving an applet environment, and all seemed to work as expected. ;-)
Cameron McCormack: > (Also I might return iterators to the classes/packages lists wrapped > with Collections.unmodifiableList so that calling code can't remove > items. That, or add removeClass()/removePackage() methods, if we want > to allow removals.) Allowing add and/or removal of items in runtime could be nice: for example, to add utility classes (such as the "java.lang.System", stated before) or allow its removal to create an 100% conformant script environment. :-) What do people think? Regards, Helder --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
