Hi Daniel,
> I created a patch for this bug. The problem was that the newNode() method > was using the wrong constructor, so that some super constructor executed > code relying on the owner document aready being set. With my patch, the > cloning behaviour of BindableElement is like that of GenericElementNS. > I would like to contribute my patch to the Batik project. It's great that you choose to contribute to Batik. :-) > Should I post it here, to the developer's mailing list, > or rather create a bug report on Bugzilla and attach it there? As none of the Batik committers [1] has replied in a few days, I can imagine there's currently lack of time to deal with it, at least within the mailing list -- it might end up getting lost. With that in mind, I'd recommend creating a new bug report and attaching the patch there. I'd also suggest leaving a link to this thread [2] in the bug report and pasting a link to the bug on this thread also, so that someone which stumbles in one of them can easily jump to the other, use this thread for discussion, bug's history and background, etc. ;-) > Thanks and best regards, Best regards, Helder Magalhães [1] http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/batik/contributors.html#committers [2] http://www.nabble.com/NPE-calling-cloneNode-for-SVG-1.2-documents-td22080561.html --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
