Thomas, You're quite right to be stubborn! Unfortunately, I can no longer be of much help: I use Batik, but I use the Java binding to the DOM, and know much less about how the DOM interacts with JavaScript. I hope someone with more experience of Javascript can help you.
mit freundlichen gruessen, Martin 2009/11/3 <[email protected]>: >> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- >> Von: "Martin Jacobson" <[email protected]> > >> I see what you mean, but the problem is, the properties of a DOM node >> object ARE the attributes of the XML node! > > > Sorry, but I doubt that. Take the following example: > > <?xml version="1.0"?> > <!DOCTYPE svg PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD SVG 1.1//EN" > "http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/1.1/DTD/svg11.dtd";> > > <svg version="1.1" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"; onload="init()"> > <script type="text/javascript"> > init = function(){ > testnode = document.getElementById("testnode") > alert(testnode.fill) > alert(testnode.getAttributeNS(null,"fill")) > testnode.fill="red" > } > </script> > <rect id="testnode" fill="black" width="100" height="100" x="150" y="150"/> > </svg> > > > If you were right, then alert(testnode.fill) should say "black", but it > doesn't. Neither with Batik nor in any Browser I tested. Likewise, > testnode.fill="red" should change the rect's color to red, but it doesn't. I > get the familiar error message: > > Java class "org.apache.batik.dom.svg.SVGOMRectElement" has no public instance > field or method named "fill". (Inline <script> > file://localhost/E:/programmieren/svg/js/js_attribute_to_node_object_4.svg:6#6) > >> Adding an arbitrary >> Javascript property to a DOM node is the same thing as adding that >> attribute to the XML node, so if that attribute isn't allowed by the >> DTD, I guess Batik is - unfortunately for you! - correct to disallow >> it. > > According to the DTD, the fill attribute is allowed, but Batik still doesn't > accept it. On the other hand, Batik allows me to add an XML attribute to the > rect node that, according to the DTD, isn't allowed: > > > <?xml version="1.0"?> > <!DOCTYPE svg PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD SVG 1.1//EN" > "http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/1.1/DTD/svg11.dtd";> > > <svg version="1.1" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"; onload="init()"> > <script type="text/javascript"> > init = function(){ > testnode = document.getElementById("testnode") > testnode.setAttributeNS(null,"myAttribute","test") > alert(testnode.getAttributeNS(null,"myAttribute")) > } > </script> > <rect id="testnode" fill="black" width="100" height="100" x="150" y="150"/> > </svg> > > >> As a practical alternative, can't you define an object that *contains* >> the DOM node, plus any other properties you may wish to add? >> > > Certainly, I can work around this. But I still would like to clarify whether > this is a bug in Batik or on purpose. Sorry if I'm becoming stubborn, but I > really want to understand what's right and wrong in this context. > > Thomas W. > ______________________________________________________ > GRATIS für alle WEB.DE-Nutzer: Die maxdome Movie-FLAT! > Jetzt freischalten unter http://movieflat.web.de > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > -- >From my MacBook Pro --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
