Hi All,
It's now fixed in SVN (rev 946961).
jonathan wood <[email protected]> wrote on 05/20/2010 10:41:16
PM:
> Very much agreed. I also think I was way off....I missed the close
> () override on the underlying stream.
> On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 9:26 PM, Cameron McCormack <[email protected]>
wrote:
> Thomas DeWeese:
> > > Really in my mind the main issue is that you should be able to call
> > > flush whenever you want and not cause real havok which isn't the
> > > case without the proposed patch.
> jonathan wood:
> > I agree...why the "closed" underlying stream allows modification seems
a bit
> > perverse.
> I agree with both of those points. The simple fix of not writing a zero
> length IDAT chunk when flush() is called seems best to me.
>
> --
> Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
