I have finally had a chance to try registering Bayonne with an asterisk
server (sip) rather than partysip or ser. For Asterisk I have a simple
sip.conf for it:
[290]
username=290
type=friend
secret=testing
record_out=On-Demand
record_in=On-Demand
qualify=no
port=5060
nat=never
host=dynamic
dtmfmode=info
context=from-internal
canreinvite=no
callerid="Spot Testing" <290>
From Bayonne I have spotplay.scr:
register.sip uri=sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] proxy=192.168.1.95 \
userid=290 secret=testing
play &number 123
sleep 500ms
play &number 123
exit
^2
echo "interrupt"
exit
This could of course also be put into a ~/.bayonnerc for testing:
[sip]
proxy = 192.168.1.95
userid = 290
secret = testing
And I set the timeout to 1 minute (I have also since fixed Bayonne's sip
registration stuff to use seconds, not minutes...). This was so I could
see what happens during refreshs without having to wait very long...
Sure enough it registers. I can dial 290 from another extension, and it
calls my server and runs my script just as it should! However, every
time it refreshes, it returns to me both a fail and accept on the
registration through exosip (eXosip "1", I haven't converted to exosip2
yet...). So I get both a fail and confirm event back...how very odd!
Also, according to Asterisk, it claims not to see me actively
"monitoring" my sip endpoint, though, again, it is quite able to send me
calls.
So the question is which is broken (something in Bayonne, Asterisk, in
eXosip?!), and if so in what way? Is it normal to get two responses
back? Why doesn't it see me as monitoring, yet is still able to send me
calls? Asterisk could not seem to do this for my old broken bt100 once
it lost track of its monitoring....
begin:vcard
fn:David Sugar
n:Sugar;David
org:GNU Telephony
adr:;;;;;;USA
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
url:http://www.gnutelephony.org
version:2.1
end:vcard
_______________________________________________
Bayonne-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bayonne-devel
