Right now I am trying an experiment with libpri 1.2.1 and pushing the pri_internal.h and pri_q931.h headers external from that, then building libsangoma. Yes, I think either having it in hardware or, so long as it has different build requirements, having a fork integrated directly into libsangoma, would be best, as it eliminates the potential conflicts that currently exist.
Brian West wrote: > > On Jan 4, 2006, at 11:08 AM, David Sugar wrote: > >> >> This driver uses an older version of libpri, but a varient build which >> exposes the pri_internal.h header. It is a shame they didn't choose to >> just fork it and have it under a different link library name and >> include >> directory by default, as it is sure to cause conflicts with those who >> have installed libpri for asterisk. Of course its still beta, so maybe >> they will resolve this issue later. > > > We are working with Nenad on this at some point we either hope to > have the q931 in hardware or fork the code and make it part of > libsangoma as you pointed out. > > /b > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Bayonne-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bayonne-devel
begin:vcard fn:David Sugar n:Sugar;David org:GNU Telephony email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED] tel;work:+1 201 215 2609 x-mozilla-html:FALSE url:http://www.gnutelephony.org version:2.1 end:vcard
_______________________________________________ Bayonne-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bayonne-devel
