On Sun, Dec 27, 2020 at 05:38:01PM -0500, Olek Wojnar wrote: > Hi Julian, > On Sat, Dec 26, 2020 at 2:25 PM Julian Gilbey <[email protected]> wrote: > > Ooo, that will be an issue. This package (upstream source at > https://github.com/dae/anki.git) now uses Python, Rust and Node > packages, so it's got quite a lot of dependencies. I'm assuming it > calls cargo to build the Rust library, and goodness only knows what it > does with Node... So this package may have to wait for buster+1, > which is fine - there's a perfectly good older version in buster. > > Do you mean bullseye (and bullseye+1)? If so, that's probably a safe decision > right now if you already have a good version of anki in testing. > Looking through the anki source, the Bazel packaging doesn't actually look > *that* complicated. However, if there's not a compelling reason to rush, I'd > suggest waiting until Bazel builds in Debian are more stable (and easier). I > anticipate Bazel achieving First Class Citizen status sometime during the > bullseye+1 cycle so that'll be a good time to pursue this upgrade. > -Olek
Hi Olek, Thanks for the advice! And yes, you're right - I did mean bullseye+1. So I'll just sit tight for now! Best wishes, and thanks for your work on Bazel! Julian -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~bazel-team Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~bazel-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
