Hi,
I've seen some minor problems with bbdb and I hope I've fixed some of
them;-)
X-Mailer: VM 6.75 under 21.1 (patch 9) "Canyonlands" XEmacs Lucid
BBDB version 2.00.06 (1999/01/25 06:16:02)
Thanks,
-- Marco
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
*** ChangeLog Tue Apr 25 18:49:19 2000
--- ChangeLog~ Fri Jul 23 00:35:07 1999
***************
*** 1,13 ****
- 2000-04-25 Marco Walther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
- * bbdb-com.el (bbdb-display-completion-list): It's not a good idea
- to discard the call-back and user data!!
- (bbdb-complete-name): The 'pred does not work as expected with the
- hash table. And I've a general question whether it's a good idea
- to have one completion entry per record?! I've a lot of records
- with the name and at least two (work & home) email addresses and I
- would like to see all of them as choices;-)
-
1999-01-24 Matt Simmons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* lisp/bbdb.el: BBDB 2.00.06 released
--- 1,3 ----
*** bbdb-com.el Tue Apr 25 18:48:27 2000
--- bbdb-com.el~ Sat Nov 27 12:49:43 1999
***************
*** 1680,1693 ****
(setq bbdb-complete-name-saved-window-config nil))))
(defun bbdb-display-completion-list (list &optional callback data)
! "Wrapper for display-completion-list."
! ;; MARCO CALLBACK and DATA are discarded.
! ;; That's a bad idea if you have not only net addresses in the
! ;; completion list!
! ;; Or the second case is: typed `Marco' and completion choosen
! ;; `marco walther' and you will end up with `Marcomarco walther' in
! ;; the buffer:-(
! (display-completion-list list :activate-callback callback :user-data data))
(defun bbdb-complete-clicked-name (event extent user-data)
"Find the record for a name clicked in a completion buffer.
--- 1680,1688 ----
(setq bbdb-complete-name-saved-window-config nil))))
(defun bbdb-display-completion-list (list &optional callback data)
! "Wrapper for display-completion-list.
! CALLBACK and DATA are discarded."
! (display-completion-list list))
(defun bbdb-complete-clicked-name (event extent user-data)
"Find the record for a name clicked in a completion buffer.
***************
*** 1738,1753 ****
(setq only-one-p nil))
(setq all-the-completions
(cons sym all-the-completions))
! ;; MARCO: This does not work as expected with the hash table!!
! ;; And I've a general question whether it's a good idea to have one
! ;; completion entry per record?! I've a lot of records with the name
! ;; and at least two (work & home) email addresses and I would like to
! ;; see all of them as choices;-)
! ;; (if (eq rec yeah-yeah-this-one)
! ;; nil
(and net (setq yeah-yeah-this-one rec))
! net)))))
! ;; MARCO )
(completion (try-completion pattern ht pred)))
;; If there were multiple completions for this record, the one that was
;; picked is random (hash order.) So canonicalize that to be the one
--- 1733,1742 ----
(setq only-one-p nil))
(setq all-the-completions
(cons sym all-the-completions))
! (if (eq rec yeah-yeah-this-one)
! nil
(and net (setq yeah-yeah-this-one rec))
! net))))))
(completion (try-completion pattern ht pred)))
;; If there were multiple completions for this record, the one that was
;; picked is random (hash order.) So canonicalize that to be the one
--
_______________________________________________
bbdb-info mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/bbdb-info
