I found that the problem was (I think) that you don't get a hash
(bbdb-gethash) if the string passed ends in a blank, and that is what
you get from bbdb-divide-name if there is just a last name. It also
gives you a problem if the lastname ends with a blank. Shoud it be
fixed in bbdb-gethash?
Below a patch for the bbdb-divide-name that does not give an empty
string if there is just one name (firs or last). Is it the right
way or am I totally out?
/Micce
--- /usr/local/lib/xemacs/xemacs-packages/lisp/bbdb/bbdb.el Sat Nov 27 21:49:44
1999
+++ lisp/bbdb.el Fri May 19 16:44:59 2000
@@ -2174,7 +2174,7 @@
(concat
(substring str (match-beginning 1))
(or gubbish "")))
- (list string ""))))
+ (list string))))
(defun bbdb-check-alternate-name (possible-name record)
(let (aka)
--- /usr/local/lib/xemacs/xemacs-packages/lisp/bbdb/bbdb.el Sat Nov 27 21:49:44
1999
+++ lisp/bbdb.el Fri May 19 16:36:02 2000
@@ -2174,7 +2174,8 @@
(concat
(substring str (match-beginning 1))
(or gubbish "")))
- (list string ""))))
+; (list string ""))))
+ (list string))))
(defun bbdb-check-alternate-name (possible-name record)
(let (aka)
--
Mikael Hedin +46 (0)980 79176
Institutet f�r rymdfysik +46 (0)980 73547 (home)
Box 812, 981 28 KIRUNA, Sweden +46 (0)980 79050 (fax)
_______________________________________________
bbdb-info mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/bbdb-info
