On , May 20 2001 15:14:22, Kai Grossjohann wrote:
> I've just released a new version of message-x which tries to do
> something useful on unknown headers or in case there is nothing to do
> on the current header.
>
> But if I invoke bbdb-complete-name with point after an
> already-completed name, then BBDB rings the bell.
>
> Since my command does something useful in this case, I think ringing
> the bell is not the right answer. So is there a way to tell BBDB to
> not ring the bell?
Now there is one:
2001-05-21 Robert Fenk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* lisp/bbdb-com.el (bbdb-complete-name):
(bbdb-complete-name-hooks): Instead of dinging when completing a
complete address (and with cycling disabled) call theses hook
functions.
Robert
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bbdb-info
BBDB Home Page: http://bbdb.sourceforge.net/
