Robert Fenk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Saturday, January 12, 2002 at 14:04:44, Alex Schroeder wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Adam C. Finnefrock) writes:
> >
> > > Is it a crime to have a BBDB entry without a net field? :)
> > > Seriously, should I put in bogus e-mail addresses for these records?
> >
> > No, I have dozens of entries without e-mail addresses in them. But I
> > don't send them mail, either. When I try, I get this:
> >
> > cond: Current record unhas a network addresses.
> >
> > Thus I wonder -- when are you getting that message, exactly?
>
> Does it occur when you call bbdb-define-all-aliases in a
> mail-mode-hook? Then you might have a record with alias,
> but without net.
>
That's exactly right, it occurs during the call to bbdb-define-all-aliases,
set up in message-setup-hook. I am using the mail aliases as a semantic
groupings as well as for e-mail, so now the error message makes sense.
I can add null net addresses or just set bbdb-silent-running.
record "" unhas network addresses
I'm guessing the quotes should have something meaningful inside. Or maybe
this is a sinister manifestation of Newspeak? :)
Change "" to %s:
--- /home/adam/tmp/bbdb/lisp/bbdb-com.el Wed Jan 9 08:17:02 2002
+++ bbdb-com.el Sun Jan 13 12:28:06 2002
@@ -2359,7 +2359,7 @@
bbdb-define-all-aliases-field)
","))
(if (not bbdb-silent-running)
- (bbdb-warn "record \"\" unhas network addresses"
+ (bbdb-warn "record %s unhas network addresses"
(bbdb-record-name record)))
(setq aliases nil))
Thanks for the help,
Adam
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bbdb-info
BBDB Home Page: http://bbdb.sourceforge.net/
