On 13 May 2002, Matt Armstrong wrote: > I'm not sure why you have the backtick (`) in your regexp. Maybe that > is causing the problem. Here is the regexp I use (the code is part of > a cond call):
> ((string-match > "^\\(.+?\\)\\(.\\)dated\\2[0-9]+\\.[0-9a-fA-F]+\\(@.*\\)" addr) > (concat (match-string 1 addr) (match-string 3 addr))) Thanks for your reply. I've changed my code to yours but unfortunately the problem still occurs. Eg.: I have a record, with the name "Joe Foo", email "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" Now I get a message from him, which has the following From field: From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] BBDB correctly recognizes that the email address is "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" and thus it comes up with Joe Foo's record. But for some reasons it believes that the From: header of this message contains a user name besides the email address as well (which is obviously false), and thinks that this user name is "joe-dated". Therefore it asks if the record's name (which was entered by me earlier) should be changed to "joe-dated". I'd like to avoid this question (and not by setting bbdb-use-alternate-names to nil). I have "joe" in the AKA field of the record, if that counts. Ideas? Thanks, -- BALI, Andra's GPG KeyID: 78560E1C [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://drewie.hup.hu Debian GNU/Linux. The Universal Operating System. http://www.debian.org _______________________________________________________________ Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bbdb-info BBDB Home Page: http://bbdb.sourceforge.net/
