On Wed, 3 Mar 2004, Robert Widhopf-Fenk uttered the following: > On Wednesday, March 3, 2004 at 15:18:48, Ronan Waide wrote: >> On March 3, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: >> > I think a lot of people want this and no one has gotten around to >> > it. >> > >> > Adding net-old which is checked when asking 'do we know this >> > addr', but not used for completion, as you suggest, would be >> > great. >> >> Actually, it has been done as an add-on rather than as part of the >> core BBDB code. Check the mail archives for bbdb-expire to see the >> discussion, and grab Nix's code here: >> http://www.esperi.demon.co.uk/nix/ > > Without looking at the code ... IMHO bbdb-expire does > something different.
It does, but I've been meaning to extend it to handle expiry of *parts* of BBDB records (fields, parts of multi-element fields like net) as well. It shouldn't be hard: I'll try to get it done tomorrow evening. -- `note to the crown prosecution service: Machine guns dont have a 'stun' setting.' --- mjw ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bbdb-info BBDB Home Page: http://bbdb.sourceforge.net/
