> * Roland Winkler <jvax...@tah.bet> [2011-04-18 16:21:29 -0500]: > On Mon Apr 18 2011 Sam Steingold wrote: >> > * Roland Winkler <jvax...@tah.bet> [2011-04-16 18:19:20 -0500]: >> > On Fri Apr 15 2011 Leo wrote: >> >> I wonder if it makes sense to replace bbdb-defstruct with defstruct? >> > What benefit(s) would you expect from that? >> - less code duplication (more maintainable) >> - smaller memory footprint >> - benefit from potential speedups in the mainline code > > I still don't know how this would work. But I'll be happy to look at a > patch (provided it doesn't break too much).
To test a patch I need to switch to bbdb 3. To switch to bbdb 3 I need to migrate my customizations. To migrate my customizations I need the list of obsolete variables in a machine-readable format (preferably an elisp file containing make-obsolete forms). -- Sam Steingold (http://sds.podval.org/) on CentOS release 5.5 (Final) X 11.0.60900031 http://camera.org http://openvotingconsortium.org http://truepeace.org http://thereligionofpeace.com http://jihadwatch.org http://pmw.org.il usually: can't pay ==> don't buy. software: can't buy ==> don't pay ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Fulfilling the Lean Software Promise Lean software platforms are now widely adopted and the benefits have been demonstrated beyond question. Learn why your peers are replacing JEE containers with lightweight application servers - and what you can gain from the move. http://p.sf.net/sfu/vmware-sfemails _______________________________________________ bbdb-info@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bbdb-info BBDB Home Page: http://bbdb.sourceforge.net/
