On Fri Apr 29 2011 Leo wrote: > I think bbdb should remain at current-record when > bbdb-display-all-records. > > The following is my naive attempt. `naive' in that I don't like invoking > (sit-for 0), which causes flickering but without it `search-forward' can > fail. Ideas?
Why do you need the sit-for? Is this code not running sequentially? Also, I would not search for the name. Each displayed record includes a marker with the buffer position where it begins. So you can right go to this position. (Check the variable bbdb-records in the *BBDB* buffer.) Yet I am not sure I understand the overall benefit of this change. If someone wants to look through all his/her records, why should point be at some particular record? While I do not use bbdb-display-all-records very often, I guess I'd find myself jumping to the beginning of the buffer each time I have invoked this command. Possibly such a feature is more suited for someone's personal bbdb init file. Or am I missing something wonderful? Roland ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ WhatsUp Gold - Download Free Network Management Software The most intuitive, comprehensive, and cost-effective network management toolset available today. Delivers lowest initial acquisition cost and overall TCO of any competing solution. http://p.sf.net/sfu/whatsupgold-sd _______________________________________________ bbdb-info@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bbdb-info BBDB Home Page: http://bbdb.sourceforge.net/
