On Mon May 9 2011 Reiner Steib wrote:
> > I am not a Gnus expert. gnus-fetch-field was used already by BBDB
> > v2. Is there someone reading this list who knows the (intended)
> > difference between gnus-fetch-field and gnus-fetch-original-field?
> 
> [ Cc-ing ding@gnus. ]  I don't know.  The doc strings need
> improvement.
> 
> > Well, the latter uses the undocumented internal variable
> > gnus-original-article-buffer. But what does this mean in real life?
> 
> I guess `gnus-original-article-buffer' holds encoded content.
> Yes...

Thanks, So it would not make sense if BBDB was using the encoded
headers. If it's guaranteed that headers returned by
gnus-fetch-field are already decoded, it is not even necessary that
bbdb-message-header calls mail-decode-encoded-word-string for these
headers.

> > Which headers are not available via gnus-fetch-field?
> 
> As you might have guessed, this is customizable in Gnus.  See (info
> "(gnus)Hiding Headers").

But that's strange: by default, gnus-visible-headers includes the
organization header. Leo started this thread because
gnus-fetch-field did not return it. So what's happening here?

Leo, have you possibly customized the value of this variable?

Roland

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WhatsUp Gold - Download Free Network Management Software
The most intuitive, comprehensive, and cost-effective network 
management toolset available today.  Delivers lowest initial 
acquisition cost and overall TCO of any competing solution.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/whatsupgold-sd
_______________________________________________
bbdb-info@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bbdb-info
BBDB Home Page: http://bbdb.sourceforge.net/

Reply via email to