Hi Mike,
On that page, right under the main heading, it says something about it
being XHTML2 translated to XHTML 1.1 via an XSL style sheet. That, no
doubt, explains why the page will display in current browsers.
Reading between the lines in the notes on the page, it still looks like
XHTML2 is a geek's tool for now. (All hail the geek!)
Rob
If this is fun, I'm having it. -- Rob Stevenson
On Oct 12, 2006, at 5:10 PM, Michael Wiik wrote:
On Oct 12, 2006, at 12:00 PM, BBEdit-Talk List wrote:
I think xhtml2 looks wonderful But I can't imagine how long it will
be until it is widely and fully supported. I mean, we are only now
starting to get a majority of browsers that are fully compliant with
CSS1 and most of the way to CSS2.
It may be closer than you think. See:
http://w3future.com/weblog/gems/xhtml2b.xml
displays for me in Safari and Firefox
--
------------------------------------------------------------------
Have a feature request? Not sure the software's working correctly?
If so, please send mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, not to the list.
List FAQ: <http://www.barebones.com/support/lists/bbedit_talk.shtml>
List archives: <http://www.listsearch.com/BBEditTalk.lasso>
To unsubscribe, send mail to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
