Greetings, On Mon, 2010-03-15 at 14:33 -0400, Steve Meuse wrote: > Dean Anderson expunged ([email protected]): > > > By contrast, IS-IS handles multiple protocols in one process with less > > overhead. Configuaration & route distribution is always consistent. > > There are no inter-op problems, and we know its going to work. Its a > > no-brainer to use IS-IS instead of OSPF4 and OSPF6 together. So once > > you see that no brainer, the next obvious no-brainer is to use CLNS > > instead of IPV6. Once again, all the benefits of IPV6, none of the > > drawbacks. There are no inter-op worries with CLNS. > > Is this troll bait, or do you actually believe that?
He claims you would need to have no brain to go with that. Yes, I believe that is an honest statement ... *grin* -dkap > > -Steve > > _______________________________________________ > bblisa mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.bblisa.org/mailman/listinfo/bblisa _______________________________________________ bblisa mailing list [email protected] http://www.bblisa.org/mailman/listinfo/bblisa
