On Tue, 26 Feb 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi, > > I agree in that we should have something that makes mapping from > Java reflection to BCEL easier, maybe someone should volunteer > for an adapter class ...
I'm currently doing this anyway so I might as well do it correctly. How do you think this should be done? > However, the adapter would just wrap the ugly details, the > implementation probably wouldn't look much different, since you have no > other choice. (Do you?) > Going via the signature is simple and proven to be working. > > The Modifier flags should in fact be exactly the same as the ones used > in BCEL since they also stem from the JVM spec. > > Cheers > Markus Andreas -- I think, so IAM. Andreas Schlapbach [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.iam.unibe.ch/~schlpbch -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
