Can you post some example code somewhere? Our project could definately use
some speedup in the portions that use reflect.
Thanks,
-Phil
clloyd3@attbi
.com To: "BCEL Users List"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
05/16/2002 cc:
02:14 PM Subject: Re: Emulating
Please java.lang.reflect.AccessibleObject
respond to
"BCEL Users
List"
Yes, I measured it to be about 100x faster for both
Field and Method access, if I recall correctly.
Charles.
>
> Is your BCEL implementation faster? Are there advantages to using BCEL
> over reflect? This is kind of fascinating.
>
> Thanks,
> -Phil
>
>
>
>
> Charles Lloyd
> <clloyd3@attb To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> i.com> cc:
> Subject: Emulating
> 05/15/2002
java.lang.reflect.AccessibleObject
> 09:25 PM
> Please
> respond to
> "BCEL Users
> List"
>
>
>
>
>
>
> I am trying to write a replacement for java.lang.reflect.Method and
> Field using BCEL. I have everything working nicely except I cannot
> figure out how to emulate the setAccessible(true) feature which allows
> for access (via reflection) to protected and private Methods and Fields.
>
> Suggestions or examples greatly appreciated.
>
> Charles.
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: <
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: <
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
