David Woodhouse wrote:
On Tue, 2006-03-28 at 02:11 -0500, Simon wrote:
Are there any plans to change softmac so that wireless interfaces
aren't tr=
eated as wired interfaces?<br>
Don't send HTML to public fora.
The question doesn't make much sense. With the current code, I treat
mine as a wireless interface -- surely that's just up to the user's
policy? It doesn't need any changes in softmac.
I suspect you're actually asking if there's an plan to assign bizarre
_names_ to the device rather than using the standard 'eth%d'? I'm not
aware of any plans, or any reason why anyone would want such a thing.
Worse than naming the wireless interface eth%d, it also calls it eth0 or
eth1 randomly on my machine. That's reason enough to force a specific
name for me. Simon, check this thread in the forums:
http://bcm43xx.spugna.org/index.php?topic=18.0
TTimo
_______________________________________________
Bcm43xx-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/bcm43xx-dev
