Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday, 12 February 2007 23:20, Larry Finger wrote:
>> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> On Monday, 12 February 2007 02:18, Larry Finger wrote:
>>>> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>>>> It doesn't help in my case.  The behavior is similar to that without the 
>>>>> patch,
>>>>> but also with the patch it loses the association entirely.
>>>> Thanks for trying.
>>>>
>>>> Do you have this patch installed? If you do, please try increasing the 100 
>>>> to 200.
>>> Hm, but it wouldn't help to get the microcode to respond after the resume 
>>> ...
>> Yes it would. That count is how long the system waits for the firmware to 
>> respond.
>>
>>> I'm still thinking the problem is with the firmware.  Where exactly is it
>>> stored?
>> In the memory of the microprocessor on the card.
>>
>> Please do what I asked.
> 
> With or without the previous patch?

With the change to BCM43xx_IRQWAIT_MAX_RETRIES, but not the one that tries to 
reload the firmware.

Larry

_______________________________________________
Bcm43xx-dev mailing list
Bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/bcm43xx-dev

Reply via email to