On Thursday 15 November 2007 16:02:48 Larry Finger wrote: > >> @@ -695,11 +687,12 @@ static int dmacontroller_setup(struct b4 > >> b43_dma_write(ring, B43_DMA32_RXRING, > >> (ringbase & ~SSB_DMA_TRANSLATION_MASK) > >> | trans); > >> - b43_dma_write(ring, B43_DMA32_RXINDEX, 200); > >> + b43_dma_write(ring, B43_DMA32_RXINDEX, ring->nr_slots * > >> + sizeof(struct b43_dmadesc32)); > > > > I'm not sure why you do this change. > > It took me a while to figure out where the magic number of 200 came from, and > what I needed for the > 64-bit case. In fact I think the 200 is a bug and should be 0x200. To me, > this change makes it clearer.
The 200 is just a random number. I think we don't really care what the value is. (Except zero, which doesn't work on some devices). -- Greetings Michael. _______________________________________________ Bcm43xx-dev mailing list Bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/bcm43xx-dev
