On Jan 31, 2009, at 12:23 PM, Michael Buesch wrote: > On Saturday 31 January 2009 12:20:18 Lorenzo Nava wrote: >>>> >>> Hmmm, I think the cookies should actually be more or less >>> sequential, if >>> QoS and PIO are not used. That's rather strange. Can you try with >>> original fw and >>> see what the cookies look like? >> >> >> Yes Michael, you're right... I tried with my 4318 and openfwwf-5.1 >> and >> cookie value goes from 00 to 7E and then restarts from 00. >> Here is a portion of what cookie header field looks like during a 1 >> ping/s transmission... >> >> ... >> |6420| >> |6620| >> |6820| >> |6A20| >> |6C20| >> |6E20| >> |7020| >> |7220| >> |7420| >> |7620| >> |7820| >> |7A20| >> |7C20| >> |7E20| >> |0020| >> |0220| >> |0420| >> |0620| >> |0820| >> |0C20| >> |0E20| >> |1020| >> ... >> >> Any idea on the reason why Larry has 2 cookie sequences mixed >> togheter? > > Why are your cookies endianness swapped?
I forgot to say that these numbers are related to tx header, so I now need to check what report_tx_status send back... > > > -- > Greetings, Michael. _______________________________________________ Bcm43xx-dev mailing list Bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/bcm43xx-dev
