Michael Buesch wrote: > On Thursday 13 August 2009 20:00:47 Gábor Stefanik wrote: >> (List re-CC-ed.) >> >> 2009/8/13 Michael Buesch <m...@bu3sch.de>: >>> On Thursday 13 August 2009 19:50:16 Gábor Stefanik wrote: >>>> 2009/8/13 Michael Buesch <m...@bu3sch.de>: >>>>> On Thursday 13 August 2009 17:02:21 Gábor Stefanik wrote: >>>>>> Rev.2+/B2063 will now hopefully show some signs of life, though >>>>>> it won't work at full performance, as calibration is still missing. >>>>>> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Gábor Stefanik <netrolller...@gmail.com> >>>>>> static void lpphy_baseband_rev0_1_init(struct b43_wldev *dev) >>>>>> @@ -1369,7 +1370,7 @@ static int b43_lpphy_op_init(struct b43_wldev *dev) >>>>>> lpphy_baseband_init(dev); >>>>>> lpphy_radio_init(dev); >>>>>> lpphy_calibrate_rc(dev); >>>>>> - //TODO set channel >>>>>> + b43_switch_channel(dev, dev->wl->hw->conf.channel->hw_value); >>>>> Does dev->wl->hw->conf.channel->hw_value already have a sane value here? >>>> I think it should - hw->conf.channel was handed to us by mac80211. >>>> http://bcm-v4.sipsolutions.net/802.11/PHY/LP/Init says "Set channel >>>> with current chanspec as argument", and hw->conf.channel is our >>>> equivalent of chanspec. >>> hw->conf.channel was not handed to us at all. You simply pick it >>> from mac80211's conf structure and _assume_ that it is initialized. >>> In the other PHY implementations we use phyop_default_channel (or mandatory >>> hardcoded channel values) in the PHY init only. I think you should do the >>> same here. Mac80211 will make sure to select the correct channel later. >> OK, I will use the default channel (though that's not exactly what the >> spec says - Larry, is using the default channel correct?) > > What on earth could be incorrect about it? It's an as arbitrary value as > dev->wl->hw->conf.channel->hw_value would be.
I have not found anything that says what should be used. If the channel is valid for the selected band, it should be as good as any. > >>>>> Also please call b43_lpphy_op_switch_channel() instead of >>>>> b43_switch_channel(). >>>> No, that would be wrong; the generic parts of b43_switch_channel also >>>> need to be executed. See >>> I don't see why. The generic parts are nothing that should be done at the >>> PHY init. >> Well, the spec says that the generic parts need to be run, so I >> implemented it as such. > > We do understand what the generic stuff does and it is not required at this > point. > >> Larry, is this part of the spec correct? > > I'm pretty sure it is. But that does not mean we have to implement the same > bullshit broadcom does ;) Amen. I have to put it on the web site just in case it is important, but it must be done that way _ONLY_ if found to be needed for operation or performance. Larry _______________________________________________ Bcm43xx-dev mailing list Bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/bcm43xx-dev
