On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 11:29 AM, Oncaphillis <oncaphil...@snafu.de> wrote: > On 11/20/2009 10:27 AM, Michael Buesch wrote: >> On Friday 20 November 2009 02:41:58 Oncaphillis wrote: >>> On 11/20/2009 12:46 AM, Oncaphillis wrote: >>>> On 11/19/2009 06:44 PM, Michael Buesch wrote: >>>>> On Thursday 19 November 2009 16:41:12 Michael Buesch wrote: >>>>>> Wait, that still can't work. I'll fix it soon... >>>>> >>>>> Ok, here's the updated version. Please test this: >>>>> http://bu3sch.de/patches/wireless-testing/20091119-1842/patches/002-ssb-rewrite-sprom-fallback-mechanism.patch >>>>> >>>> >>>> Heureka -- seems like I'm the first linux user on the planet with a >>>> WLAN connection on that device. The MAC address is random which >>>> of course is a pain for DHCP but it seems to work. >> >> Thanks. I'll see what I can do about this. >> >> >>> [ 6415.479127] b43-phy0 debug: Removing Interface type 2 >>> [ 6415.479601] b43-phy0 debug: Wireless interface stopped >>> [ 6415.479615] b43-phy0 debug: DMA-64 rx_ring: Used slots 8/64, Failed >>> frames 0/0 = 0.0%, Average tries 0.00 >>> [ 6415.479710] b43-phy0 debug: DMA-64 tx_ring_AC_BK: Used slots 0/256, >>> Failed frames 0/0 = 0.0%, Average tries 0.0 >>> [ 6415.481511] b43-phy0 debug: DMA-64 tx_ring_AC_BE: Used slots 152/256, >>> Failed frames 2795/23615 = 11.8%, Averag tries 3.38 >>> [ 6415.483077] b43-phy0 debug: DMA-64 tx_ring_AC_VI: Used slots 0/256, >>> Failed frames 0/0 = 0.0%, Average tries 0.0 >>> [ 6415.485064] b43-phy0 debug: DMA-64 tx_ring_AC_VO: Used slots 12/256, >>> Failed frames 35/2939 = 1.1%, Average tris 1.05 >>> [ 6415.487069] b43-phy0 debug: DMA-64 tx_ring_mcast: Used slots 0/256, >>> Failed frames 0/0 = 0.0%, Average tries 0.0 >>> >>> and loose the interface >> >> Well, somebody shuts down the interfsce. There's nothing wrong with these >> logs. >> I would point at network manager or something like that. >> > > > Ok -- Some more details about my experience that it appears to be slow. > As a test I've transfered a couple of 100 Mbyte files via NFS to my > desktop. > > I don't know much about the overhead it has but if wlan0 tells me > I have a 11MBit connection a throughput of at least 500kbyte/s should > be possible and I'm far away from this. It also appeared that the > transfer freezes for a couple of seconds ( I had a look at the file > sizes on the recipient side in second intervals). Nothing > suspicious in dmesg or syslog though. > > This of course is a very crude analysis, but if someone can point me > to better tools to check for data throughput and connection stability > I'll be happy to check in more detail. > > Sebastian >
Performance issues are still normal, as periodic calibration is incomplete. -- Vista: [V]iruses, [I]ntruders, [S]pyware, [T]rojans and [A]dware. :-) _______________________________________________ Bcm43xx-dev mailing list Bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/bcm43xx-dev
