On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 7:09 PM, Larry Finger <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 02/05/2010 10:41 AM, Gábor Stefanik wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 4:24 AM, Larry Finger <[email protected]> 
>> wrote:
>>> On 02/04/2010 02:57 PM, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>>>> ---
>>>> Gábor: I think you missed specs here. Could you check whole routine just 
>>>> for
>>>> sure, please? I don't understand whole radio and chanspec magic yet.
>>>> ---
>>>>  drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_lp.c |    2 +-
>>>>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_lp.c 
>>>> b/drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_lp.c
>>>> index 185219e..61009ee 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_lp.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_lp.c
>>>> @@ -2655,8 +2655,8 @@ static int b43_lpphy_op_switch_channel(struct 
>>>> b43_wldev *dev,
>>>>               if (err)
>>>>                       return err;
>>>>               lpphy_set_analog_filter(dev, new_channel);
>>>> -             lpphy_adjust_gain_table(dev, channel2freq_lp(new_channel));
>>>>       }
>>>> +     lpphy_adjust_gain_table(dev, channel2freq_lp(new_channel));
>>>>
>>>>       lpphy->channel = new_channel;
>>>>       b43_write16(dev, B43_MMIO_CHANNEL, new_channel);
>>>
>>> Both the lpphy_set_analog_filter() and lpphy_adjust_gain_table() calls 
>>> should be
>>> outside the if statement. I changed the spec a little. It used to test 
>>> "radio
>>> enabled", but I have found that is always true for our driver.
>>>
>>> Larry
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Isn't set_analog_filter() rev0/1-specific?
>
> It was in the 4.174.64.19 driver that I RE'd when you wrote the LP PHY code.
> That as changed in 5.10.56.46, which I am now doing. It will take me a while 
> to
> complete the new routine "LP PHY TX Filter Init" and a routine that it calls.
>
> Certainly, there is no hurry that these changes be made. Whenever you or Rafał
> have time. There is no guarantee that these changes will have any effect on 
> the
> LP PHY operations. Hitting a moving target is not easy.
>
> Larry
>

Just out of curiosity, is 5.10.56.46 available anywhere (for firmware reasons)?

-- 
Vista: [V]iruses, [I]ntruders, [S]pyware, [T]rojans and [A]dware. :-)
_______________________________________________
Bcm43xx-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/bcm43xx-dev

Reply via email to