I don't know if I'm alone with my opinion, but I would expect some infomration about the different things to take care about at ISP-ISP (peering and transit) and ISP-Customer based eBGP connections.
Karsten Am Mittwoch, 21. Mai 2014, 10:40:02 schrieb Bill Armstrong: Below is an ULTRA-HIGH-LEVEL outline which I hope will help get the BCOP SME juices flowing. BCOP OUTLINE: -Basic Operation and Features\Functions --iBGP vs. eBGP --Path Selection refresher -Turning up eBGP Peering --Pre-turn-up considerations ---Policy Stuff(Communities, Max-Prefix, Filtering, Etc) --Post Turn-up Considerations ---IRR\PeeringDB -Testing and Validation -CONCLUSION (-Profit?) Thanks again! Bill On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 10:35 AM, Bill Armstrong <wrarmstr...@gmail.com[1]> wrote: Ahoy There! Over the last few months the NANOG BCOP committee has combed through the NANOG and various other NOG/IETF-Ops mailing lists and have identified a stack reoccurring or pressing questions and concerns which we are using as seeds for our initial BCOP Appeals. One exceptionally frequent line of questions tend to be rooted in what amounts to "eBGP 101/102"(how to turn up and test a peer and potential pitfalls there-in). While there is already a "Public Peering Exchange" BCOP and a draft for "IPv6 Peering" is in the works, it appears that the fundamentals need to be captured and put on display. Although there are already a handful of SMEs on-board, our goal is to define the BEST practices so the more insight we can get into this problem the better! If you are interested in acting as a SME for the "eBGP Configuration BCOP" please let me know, this is your chance to sow your expertise across the internet! THANKS! Bill Armstrong P.S. I'll be at NANOG 61 so if you aren't sure about the commitment or have questions about the BCOP process don't hesitate to track me down for a chat! -------- [1] mailto:wrarmstr...@gmail.com
_______________________________________________ BCOP mailing list BCOP@mailman.nanog.org http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/bcop
