Was about to chime in with a similar thought myself. Do we have to re-invent 
the wheel here WRT protocol? Can the “machine-parsable template” simply be 
CalDAV, with some standard logic around mapping calendar “Guests” to various 
services/circuits a customer may have with a vendor?

-C

> On Mar 17, 2015, at 1:31 PM, Matt Peterson <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> This seems like a great idea, were you thinking of using vCal/iCal 
> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ICalendar> and/or another format for sharing 
> or describing these events? It would also be useful to have some attributes 
> such as "you may be impacted by this work" vs "you will be impacted".
> 
> --Matt
> 
> On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 12:40 PM, Erik Klavon <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> Greetings
> 
> We all generate and consume communications on maintenance activities. I’ve 
> put in my time manually processing these communications, converting time 
> zones, adding entries to calendars, opening tickets, and – as with any manual 
> process – introducing the occasional error along the way. Much of the time 
> these notifications are carried in an email, the format of which varies from 
> sender to sender. I’d love to have some conventions for the formatting of the 
> information in these emails. Such conventions would make it simple to create 
> tools that eliminate the more boring and error prone aspects of processing 
> these emails.
>  
> I’m shepherding a BCOP effort to identify common forms of notification, their 
> common content, and propose machine parsable templates for notifications. 
> Operators may include completed instances of these templates in their 
> notifications to aid in their digestion. Thanks to the work of Randy Neals, 
> who first championed this idea, we have a couple subject matter experts from 
> the community who have signed on to this effort. We’re looking for additional 
> people to get involved, especially people with programming experience. Reach 
> out to me if you’re interested.
> 
> Erik
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> BCOP mailing list
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/bcop 
> <http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/bcop>
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> BCOP mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/bcop

_______________________________________________
BCOP mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/bcop

Reply via email to