Hi Sander, On 30/05/16 15:48, Sander Steffann wrote: >> Thanks for coordinating this and making this statement at the closing >> plenary session. > > Unfortunately the plenary didn't accept the statement as a community > statement/resolution as-is. The good news is that the reason for that is that > they wanted a stronger statement :) Ruediger Volk was the person stating that > on the microphone during the plenary, and he offered to help improve the > language. I talked to Hans Petter Holen about what to do next, and he > suggested taking this to the ripe-list so we can get consensus there and > still turn this into a community-wide supported statement, which I think is > important. > > I suggest Ruediger and I work on the text and then take it straight to the > ripe-list. Doing word-smithing first in BCOP and then on the ripe-list will > probably double the work, and as the BCOP task force already had consensus on > the old version I'd like to take this directly to the superset :-) > > Do you agree with this plan?
I was happy to hear that the plenary supported the idea, but asked for a stronger wording of the statement. The procedure you suggested makes sense to me. Best, - Benno -- Benno J. Overeinder NLnet Labs http://www.nlnetlabs.nl/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
