Why don't you include him on the reply?
Taskinoor Hasan wrote: > this survey is a total shit. i left it when i found too much questions about > money. and i dont think people related with this survey believe in open > source philosophy. > > can anyone please find out more information about this survey. > > On 3/6/07, Jamil Ahmed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> :)) >> >> Another point is, the original poster Omi, who fwd it in this list >> deleted some important lines from the header. >> >> "On 2/28/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <lmth%40deakin.edu.au> <[EMAIL >> PROTECTED]<lmth%40deakin.edu.au>> >> wrote:" >> >> I was wondering what was the "To:" address or where was the original >> post submitted in the first place. We should forward mails with full >> headers, so people can know the original source. Anyway... >> >> >> On 3/6/07, russell kabir <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <russell33rd%40yahoo.com>> >> wrote: >> >>> Fantastic! You have understood it also and laid out the reasons in such >>> >> a fine way that expresses the exact response from open source developers. I >> am NOT a developer, but i've been using Linux and voice its benefit over >> windows all the time. As a user, thought to response in the survey....but >> after going in the second page i had a feeling that the survey is >> detrimental to open source culture, and i stopped. Today the mail from you >> superbly express the feeling i had. >> >>> Thanks for your nice mail. >>> >>> Kind regards >>> Russell >>> >>> Linux Bangladesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <bdlug%40vfemail.net>> wrote: Please >>> >> forgive me if I sound skeptical, but the way the questions had >> >>> been laid and the nature of the questionnaire forced me to believe that >>> the main aspect of the survey is to gather data on the negative aspects >>> of Open Source development. The answers will only yield results on >>> >>> a. how lonely (not alone, please understand the difference) an Open >>> Source developer is >>> b. how secluded an open source developer is >>> c. how poor / lacking money / underpaid / under-remmunerated an Open >>> Source developer is >>> >>> and so on. The survey will not yield any result that can show >>> a. The nature of enthusiasm the Open Source Community builds >>> b. The contribution a Open Source Developer is making (in any way, >>> including but not limited to -- by providing tools to both the people >>> who cannot afford a costly solution or the enthusiast learner who is >>> benefiting from the Open Source Software) >>> c. The philosophy of the Open Source Community / Developer / development >>> -- understanding of which, in my opinion, is one of the major part of >>> understanding what Open Source truly means. >>> >>> these are just my personal opinions -- and they DO fall under BSD >>> licensing scheme :D -- but you are at your liberty to either agree or >>> disagree >:) >>> >>> Happy Linuxing >>> >>> Omi Azad wrote: >>> >>>> On 2/28/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <lmth%40deakin.edu.au> <mailto:lmth%<lmth%25> >>>> >> 40deakin.edu.au> >> >>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <lmth%40deakin.edu.au> <mailto:lmth% <lmth%25> >>>> >> 40deakin.edu.au>> wrote: >> >>>> Hello >>>> My name is Lara Thynne and I am a PhD candidate at Deakin University >>>> Australia. >>>> >>>> I am currently running a survey at the following >>>> address.https://dcarf.deakin.edu.au/surveys/oss/ >>>> <address.https://dcarf.deakin.edu.au/surveys/oss/> >>>> The survey is completely confidential and looks at your views and >>>> motivations to use Open Source software and to participate in the >>>> community. >>>> >>>> It will only take a few minutes and your contact details will not be >>>> recorded. You can withdraw your participation at any stage. >>>> >>>> I sincerely apologize for the spammish nature of this e-mail - I don't >>>> mean to abuse this list. I am trying to collect responses from as many >>>> open source developers and users as possible and a mailing list like >>>> this is probably the best way to reach many of you. >>>> >>>> Thanks again >>>> Lara >>>> >>>> P.S The program that I am using is open source, of course >>>> www.phpsurveyor.org)! >>>> >>>>
