--- Begin Message ---
Hello everyone
The 3 first articles recommended in the "SEE ALSO" section below are a Must
Read! In fact, the whole compilation reveals a lot about the NWO staged
machinations.
Jean Hudon
Earth Rainbow Network Coordinator
http://www.cybernaute.com/earthconcert2000
P.S. Tomorrow's compilation will feature a bright beacon of hope: the World
Social Forum in Porto Alegre and the protests at the World Economic Forum
in New York.
CONTENTS
1. CIA complicit on September 11?
2. CHEMTRAILS - Covert Climate Control?
SEE ALSO:
Arab world polarizing with west (Jan 26)
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=26207
The White House is holding back until next week the punitive actions
against Yasser Arafat decided on at a top-level presidential forum convened
by President George W. Bush yesterday, DEBKAfile's Washington sources
report. (...) Bush called together his advisers to decide not only how to
deal with Yasser Arafat, but also how to fit American punitive moves
against him into the broader U.S. Middle East-Gulf policy revision
currently underway. According to DEBKA, on Wednesday, Bush sent out
diplomatic notes to Jordanian King Abdullah, Saudi Crown Prince Abdullah
and Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak containing the intelligence findings
from the Karine-A arms boat Israel intercepted on the Red Sea on Jan. 3.
They included proof of Arafat's operational, intelligence and terrorist
links with the Iranian leadership, as well as evidence of his
Tehran-assisted attempts to subvert both the Egyptian and Jordanian
regimes. (...) The U.S. presidential forum's decisions, DEBKA reports,
include severance of relations with Arafat or the Palestinian Authority,
shutting down the PLO's office in Washington and adding Arafat's Fatah, its
militant arms - the Tanzim and Aqsa Brigades - and his presidential guard,
Force 17, to the State Department's list of terror organizations.
Washington has also ended the Zinni cease-fire mediation mission. (...)
Arafat's response was not long in coming. From Ramallah, a top adviser,
Nabil Abu Rdeneh, threatened the United States that cutting ties with the
Palestinian Authority would "cause an earthquake in the region that no one
will be able to stop." The Palestinian threat raised the already spiraling
war tension in the region another notch.
What's the true historic role of staged-for-media events?
http://www.straightgoods.ca/ViewFeature.cfm?REF=291
The Viet Nam War and Desert Storm were propelled by faked or non-existent
events. What about that suspicious munitions ship found by the Israelis?
Here are two important events, each reported - and accepted - as authentic
fact at the time. Each was in reality an elaborate deception planned at the
highest levels and executed to sway public opinion. (...) Now fast forward
to a week ago Sunday. I'm watching the CBC television news. The Israelis
have easily intercepted a ship for some reason crammed openly with
munitions. I'm thinking: this is fishy. "It's almost impossible this ship
would have escaped detection," said professor Janice Stein of The
University of Toronto. Richard Gwyn of The Toronto Star called it "bizarre"
and Eric Margolies of The Toronto Sun said "It's crazy and it looks like
the whole thing was a setup of some sort." Another surprise. The Globe and
Mail finds the event "particularly odd" and quotes "a widespread
Palestinian view" that there's "something deeply suspicious about the
hugely publicized interception," that "the Israeli government may have
orchestrated."
What really happened on Sept. 11th? - Part 1 (January 21)
http://www.straightgoods.ca/ViewMediaFile.cfm?REF=136
Too many loose ends call for the toughest kind of media questions but
they're not being asked... yet.
Online petition: deny military aid to Israel until that country makes a
good faith effort to recognize the human rights of Palestinians, including
their internationally recognized right of return:
http://www.petiononline.com/LVLKY325/petition.html
Saudi Warns Bush, Don't Weaken Arafat
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/01/27/international/middleeast/27SAUD.html
US War on Terror 'Curbing Human Rights' World Wide
http://www.truthout.com/01.22E.Curbing.Rights.htm
<> <> <> <> <> <> <> <>
1.
Sent by "Mark Graffis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: http://www.straightgoods.ca/ViewNote.cfm?REF=1267
CIA complicit on September 11?
An interview with Michael Springman exposes the CIA's links with the
terrorist attacks on September 11
January 19, 2002
Ken MacAllister of Vancouver writes:
Michael Springmann worked for the US government for 20 years with the
foreign service and consulate. He just went public with the story of his
involvement in a large scale CIA operation that brought hundreds of people
from the middle east to the US, issued them passports and trained them to
be terrorists. Springmann says that the CIA is working closely with Bin
Laden and his operatives in Jeddah and has been since 1987. The most
haunting implication from this interview is that all of the terrorist acts
of late were planned and paid for by the CIA with US taxpayers money so
that the US could legitimately bomb the hell out of Afghanistan -- not to
"get the Taliban" as the official party line states, but to erase all of
the evidence of the US's secret operations in Afghanistan left over from
its 10 year war with the Soviet Union in that country.
Based on the new information from Mr. Springmann, it is likely that most of
those 600+ people who were "rounded up" within days of the September 11
attacks were actually in the US because the CIA brought them there. It
lends credence to the idea that the CIA was also behind the anthrax letters
and that is why there was weapons -grade anthrax and why the perpetrator
will never be caught.
The interview is riveting, and I urge you to give it a listen.
Hear the interview at
http://radio.cbc.ca/programs/dispatches/audio/020116_springman.rm (a 2 meg
file)
Springman also appears in a nine minute documentary for BBC's premier
current affairs program, Newsnight: Greg Palast's "The CIA and Saudi
Arabia: The Bushes and the Bin Ladens". Go at
http://news.bbc.co.uk/olmedia/cta/progs/newsnight/attack22.ram to view the
documentary on RealPlayer. Or at
http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/events/newsnight/newsid_1645000/1645527.stm
to see the transcript.
<> <> <> <> <> <> <> <>
2.
From: http://www.nexusmagazine.com/chemtrails.html
CHEMTRAILS - Covert Climate Control?
Under the banner of some top-secret scientific agenda, the US military
continues to weave chemical-laden contrails in the skies, causing health
problems for unprotected people on the ground.
Extracted from Nexus Magazine, Volume 8, Number 6 (October-November 2001)
PO Box 30, Mapleton Qld 4560 Australia
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Telephone: +61 (0)7 5442 9280
http://www.nexusmagazine.com
by William Thomas © 2001
Heron Rocks 1-9 Hornby Island,
BC Canada V0R 1Z0
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Website: http://www.lifeboatnews.com
For nearly three years, chemtrail observers have hoped an official would
step forward to explain the origin and purpose of broad white plumes
criss-crossing the skies above a dozen allied nations. Their wait is
over...
It was nearly noon when S.T. Brendt awoke and entered the kitchen of her
country home in Parsonsfield, Maine. As she poured her first cup of coffee,
the late night reporter for WMWV Radio could not have guessed that her life
was minutes away from drastic change. Her partner Lou Aubuchont was already
up, puzzling over what he had seen in the sky a half-hour before. The fat
puffy plumes arching up over the horizon were unlike any contrail he had
ever seen, even during his hitch in the Navy.
Like breath exhaled on a winter's day, the contrails he was used to seeing
would flare briefly in the stratosphere as hot moist engine exhaust
flash-freezes into a stream of ice-crystals. These pencil-thin condensation
trails are pretty to watch but short-lived, subliming into invisibility as
exhaust gases cool quickly to the surrounding air temperature.
But in late 1997, Aubuchont started observing thicker 'trails extending
from horizon to horizon. Hanging in the sky long after their creators had
flown from view, these expanding white ribbons would invariably be
interwoven by more thick lines left by unmarked jets, Air Force white or
silver in colour.
CLIP
Looking up towards the southeast over West Pond, she spotted the first jet.
A second jet was laying billowing white banners to the north. Both aircraft
appeared to be at over 30,000 feet. Turning her gaze due west, Brendt saw
two more lines extending over the horizon. She called Lou. Within 45
minutes the couple counted 30 jets. This isn't right, S.T. thought. We just
don't have that kind of air traffic here. While Lou kept counting, she went
inside and started calling airports. One official she reached was guarded
but friendly. He had relatives in West Pond.
The Air Traffic Control manager told Brendt her sighting was "unusual". His
radars showed nine commercial jets during the same 45-minute span. From her
location, he said, she should have been able to see one plane.
And the other twenty-nine? The FAA official confided off the record that he
had been ordered "by higher civil authority" to re-route inbound European
airliners away from a "military exercise" in the area. "Of course, they
wouldn't give me any of the particulars and I don't ask," he explained. "I
just do my job."
Excited and puzzled by this information, S.T. and Lou got into their car
and headed down Route 160. Looking in any direction they could see five or
six jets flying at over 30,000 feet. Never in the dozen years they'd lived
in rural Maine had they seen so much aerial activity.
A former US Navy Intelligence courier, Aubuchont was used to large-scale
military exercises. But he told S.T. he had never seen anything this big.
"It looked like an invasion," he later recounted.
Another driver almost went off the road as he leaned over his dashboard
trying to look up. As they passed, he acknowledged them with a nod.
As far as they could see stretched line after line. Two giant grids were
especially blatant. Instead of dissipating like normal contrails, these sky
trails grew wider and wider and began to merge. Looking towards the Sun,
Aubuchont saw what appeared like "an oil and water mixture" reflecting a
prismatic band of colours. He couldn't call it a rainbow. Rainbows aren't
sinister.
As Lou and S.T. completed their errands, the jets kept them company,
leaving lines and even circles that resembled smoke rings. Even living near
Kennedy, LaGuardia and Newark jetports, Aubuchont had never seen so many
big jets performing identical manoeuvres in the same sky. When they
returned to Parsonsfield around four, the lines were starting to merge into
a dingy haze.
Richard Dean called back. After receiving S.T.'s message, the assistant
WMWV news director had gone outside with other news staff and counted 370
lines in skies usually devoid of aerial activity.
Brendt put in another call to the FAA official. He had never heard of
chemtrails. In their first face-to-face interview, the chain-smoking
controller responsible for air traffic over the northeastern seaboard
repeated his earlier statements on tape. Similar military activities were
ongoing in other regions, he added. On his 'scopes he could track the
tankers flying north into Canadian airspace.
Speaking before witnesses at WMWV on condition of strict anonymity, our
"Deep Sky" source answered a series of yes/no questions I helped Brendt
prepare when she contacted me.
After nearly three years on this case, I wanted to corroborate extremely
high levels of aluminum [aluminium] powder found in samples of rainwater
falling through thick sky plumes over Espanola, Ontario, in the spring of
1998.
The Espanola lab tests were conducted after residents began complaining to
the provincial environment ministry. Severe headaches, chronic joint pain,
dizziness, sudden extreme fatigue, acute asthma attacks and feverless
"flu-like" symptoms over a 50-square-mile area coincided with what they
termed "months of 'spraying'" by photo-identified US Air Force tanker
planes.
The USAF denied the intrusions. But former Ontario Provincial Police
Officer and Supreme Court expert witness Ted Simola reported lingering Xs
and numerous white trails, some of which "just ended" as if they had been
shut off but remained in the sky.
Another Espanola resident told me that mental confusion and short-term
memory loss were so prevalent that forgetting where their cars were parked
had become "a standing joke" in the tiny town.
On November 18, 1998, the people of Espanola petitioned Parliament.
Addressing the Canadian government on their behalf, defence critic Gordon
Earle explained:
"Over 500 residents of the Espanola area have signed a petition raising
concern over possible government involvement in what appears to be aircraft
emitting visible aerosols. They have found high traces of aluminum and
quartz in particulate and rainwater samples.
"These concerns combined with associated respiratory ailments have led
these Canadians to take action and seek clear answers from this government.
The petitioners call upon Parliament to repeal any law that would permit
the dispersal of military chaff or of any cloud-seeding substance
whatsoever by domestic or foreign military aircraft without the informed
consent of the citizens of Canada thus affected."
The Ministry of Defence eventually replied: "It's not us."
Which was true. While the US Air Force counts 650 four-engine KC-135
Stratotankers and 50 KC-10 Extenders in its active inventory, Canadian
Forces do not fly armadas of tankers. But they do operate the biggest radar
installation in Canada at CFB Comox on Vancouver Island, easily capable of
tracking the American formations coming up from the south.
"Was the classified operation a radar experiment?" we asked Deep Sky.
"That wasn't what I was told."
Were ATC radars "enhanced or degraded", we wanted to know. The barium
spread in exercises conducted out of Wright-Patterson Air Force Base acts
as an electrolyte, enhancing conductivity of radar and radio waves. "Wright
Pat" has also long been deeply engaged in HAARP's electromagnetic warfare
program.
A SKY SHIELD TO COMBAT GLOBAL WARMING?
The puzzle pieces fell into place with Deep Sky's revelation that ATC
radars were being "degraded" by tanker-released particles showing up as a
"haze" on their screens. This radar characteristic matched the high
concentrations of aluminum powder found along with a preponderance of
quartz particles in Espanola's chemtrail-contaminated rainwater.
The tankers' aluminum powder emissions also matched the Welsbach patent.
Issued in 1994 to the Hughes aerospace giant "for Reduction of Global
Warming", the sky shield blueprint calls for dispensing microscopic
particles of aluminum oxide and other reflective materials into the upper
atmosphere to reflect one or two per cent of incoming sunlight. Computer
simulations by Ken Caldeira at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
calculated that this would be enough to stop warming over 85 per cent of
the planet, despite an anticipated doubling of carbon in the atmosphere
within the next 50 years.
Lawrence Livermore priced the aerial spray program at US$1 billion dollars
a year--a cheap fix to maintain massive petroleum profits in the face of
Kyoto's internationally agreed carbon cutbacks.
Livermore's founder, Edward Teller, lobbied hard for another chance to play
with planetary processes. At the 1998 International Seminar on Planetary
Emergencies, the Father of the H-bomb presented his Next Big Idea. Having
earlier pressed for detonating nuclear bombs to carve new harbours out of
American coastlines, Teller now called for reflective chemicals to be
spread like mirror-shades over the Earth. Or at least over allies who could
agree in secret for this unprecedented geoengineering experiment to be
carried out over their unsuspecting constituents.
In a draft report leaked to me soon after it appeared for peer review in
May 2000, an expert panel chosen among 3,000 atmospheric scientists looked
at Caldeira's computer simulations and agreed that Teller's scheme might
work. But the IPCC warned against unpredictable upsets of the atmosphere,
as well as against angry populaces reacting to "the associated whitening of
the visual appearance of the sky".
Caldeira was so concerned he went public, warning that deflecting sunlight
would further cool the stratosphere, concentrating icy clouds of
ozone-gobbling CFCs that could destroy Earth's solar radiation shield.
Was the sky shield experiment already underway? Deep Sky hinted that it was.
Were the tankers involved in weather modification? Our FAA source hesitated
before responding. "That approximates what I was told."
For the third interview we rephrased our key question. Were the tankers
repeatedly observed on ATC radars involved in climate modification? I
caught my breath as Deep Sky confirmed that this is what he was told was
the object of the missions.
Here at last was our "smoking nuke" admission. After years of "airliner"
double-speak, we could now corroborate Deep Sky's report of military
aircraft dispensing reflective materials with an earlier report by a
Canadian aviation official.
On December 8, 2000, Terry Stewart, the Manager for Planning and
Environment at the Victoria International Airport, had broken this story
wide open when he responded to a caller's complaint the previous day of Xs,
circles and grids being woven over the British Columbia capitol. Leaving a
message on an answering machine tape, later heard by more than 15 million
radio listeners, the public servant explained: "It's a military exercise,
US and Canadian Air Force exercise that's going on. They wouldn't give me
any specifics on it."
Stewart added that he found the incident--one of hundreds reported over
Canada's west coast since the fall of 1998--"very odd".
Tasked with defending Canadian airspace in the region, CFB Comox chose
instead to defend a classified collaboration. "No military operation is
taking place," the base information officer tersely told me when I called
for details. But Stewart later told the Vancouver Courier that his
information had come directly from CFB Comox.
CONTRAILS vs CHEMTRAILS
Across the strait from the island air base, a concerned mother of three
children was noticing that people in Gibsons were coming down with ailments
that coincided with constant chemtrail activity. Suzanne Smart's husband
contracted asthma; their children were always sniffling and coughing. Smart
ended up in the small coastal town's Emergency unit with a sore throat,
"super-stiff" neck, pounding headache and ears "ringing like crazy". Even
her teeth hurt.
It was all very nerve-wracking. Smart contacted a Transport Canada
investigator who had noticed the jet trails too and was convinced it was
normal contrail activity. Why he took special notice of normal contrails
was not explained. But the TC official told Smart he hoped the Canadian
equivalent of the FAA would be notified of any military exercises taking
place.
On June 17, 2001, after photographing massive plumes over Gibsons, Smart
checked with aviation authorities and found that no airline flight plans
had been filed for that airspace at that time. Official weather data showed
that when her photos of multiple white plumes were taken, the 30 per cent
humidity at 30,000 and 35,000 feet was less than half that needed for
contrails to form.
As NOAA meteorologist Thomas Schlatter explains, for even short-lived
condensation trails to form, "we're talking temperatures lower than about
minus 76 degrees Fahrenheit, and humidity at jet altitudes of 70 per cent
or more".
Smart sent her findings to Transport Canada with a request for an
explanation of how contrails could form when they couldn't. "It is my
understanding," she wrote, "that the only way to form jet trails at
yesterday's low humidity is to introduce very fine particulates into the
atmosphere."
Smart's homework hit like hardball. According to the National Center for
Atmospheric Research in Boulder, Colorado, the only way to form artificial
clouds in warm dry air is to introduce enough particulates into the
atmosphere to attract and accrete all available moisture into visible
vapour. If repeated often enough, the resulting rainless haze can lead to
drought.
CLIP
The biggest laugh came when the colonel told the senator: "The Air Force is
not conducting any weather modification and has no plans to do so in the
future."
In fact, attempts to steer hurricanes by spraying heat-robbing chemicals in
their paths began in the 1950s. The recipe for creating "cirrus shields"
was outlined in an unusually arrogant US Air Force study. Subtitled "Owning
the Weather by 2025", the 1996 report explained how "weather force
specialists" were dispersing chemicals behind high-flying tanker aircraft
in a process the air force calls "aerial obscuration".
Official denials reached new altitudes of absurdity when another colonel
claimed: "The US Air Force does not conduct spraying operations over
populated areas." USAF spokeswoman Margaret Gidding told a Spokane
newspaper: "The Air Force doesn't do anything that emits anything other
than a normal contrail, which is vapor."
So were their replies. Apparently Anderson and Gidding had forgotten how US
Air Force spray planes crippled a country and a culture by dispensing over
Vietnam thousands of tons of "Agent Orange" defoliants containing dioxin
toxins as hazardous as plutonium.
SEEING IS BELIEVING?
In the end, it has proven impossible to continue skywriting giant
billboards advertising government duplicity, while insisting they are not
there. By the summer of 2001, the controversy entered a new phase. Pictures
of contrails were being distributed to newspapers by the Associated Press,
and "chemtrails" could be overheard in coffee shop conversations across an
entire continent.
When it comes to chemtrails, seeing is disbelieving official
disinformation. As public awareness grows, people like war veteran David
Oglesby are looking up. The 11 fat plumes fanning out over his Coarsegold,
California, home did it for Oglesby last June.
"The trails formed a grid pattern," he told WorldNetDaily News. "Some
stretched from horizon to horizon. Some began abruptly, and others ended
abruptly. They hung in the air for an extended period of time and gradually
widened into wispy clouds resembling spider webs."
A retired US Air Force radar tech named Shimera called a colonel
responsible for all military operations in central California. "What would
you say if I said there are three aircraft up there right now?" Shimera
asked. "Are they there?"
"No," the colonel replied. "They are not there."
The Houston study is not so easily dismissed. Mark Steadham was looking for
contrails when he started observing the skies over this busy Texas hub last
winter. Using FAA tracking software called Flight Explorer to identify each
aircraft, Steadham clocked contrails trailing from Boeing,
McDonnell-Douglas and Airbus airliners. All but two of these condensation
trails sublimed into invisibility within five to 20 seconds; the only
exceptions persisted for two and 25 minutes.
Flight Explorer does not show altitudes for military jets, but, according
to the FAA, tankers and transports usually transit continental airspace at
around 30,000 feet to ensure safe separation from airliners flying between
35,000 and 39,000 feet. Military "heavies" flying below 30,000 feet should
not leave contrails at all. Major-General Gregory Barlow confirms that Air
Force tankers do not perform refuelling missions at contrail-forming
altitudes.
But Steadham found just the opposite in his study. While observing air
traffic for 63 days, the Houston skywatcher found that thick white plumes
laid by similar-sized military aircraft--at the same time, in the same
airspace as 20-second airliner contrails--lingered for four to eight hours.
GLOBAL CHEMTRAIL REPORTS
Sightings of oddly lingering plumes sometimes resembling rocket trails are
not confined to North American skies.
While on leave in Italy in the summer of 1999, the US Navy's Kitty Chastain
sat on her hotel balcony and watched aerial grids being laid all day just
offshore over the Bay of Naples. "People were coughing all over Naples,"
she wrote. On the bus ride in from the base, Chastain explained chemtrails
to many sailors with hacking coughs.
On October 12 that same year, a Paris correspondent reported "...heavy
activity from all directions, X upon X. The pilots here seem to like to
play chicken; they fly right at each other and then one will swerve, their
trails forming pitchforks and Xs." No contrails were being left by "normal
planes" in the same skies. But the next day, planes flying over Paris "from
all directions" obscured the sky with more Xs that continued into the
evening.
In Spain on April 27, 2000, American tourist John Hendricks dashed off a
quick email from El Café de Internet: "Were we surprised to see that the
chemtrails are as bad here as they are anywhere, both in Mallorca and in
Barcelona." He and his wife "took plenty of pictures" before noticing a
postcard they'd bought captured a perfect chemtrail.
"Add Sweden to the list," a Swedish resident wrote after spotting eight to
10 parallel 'trails and contracting flu for the first time in years.
Weather conditions at the time were not conducive to contrail formation. "I
know the commercial routes, and we have a bunch of them, but not where
these trails were."
Chemtrail activity has been reported in at least 14 allied nations
including Australia, Belgium, Britain, Canada, France, Germany, Holland,
Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, Scotland, Sweden and the United States.
Croatian chemtrails began the day after that country joined NATO.
ATMOSPHERIC ORGANISMS
Many chemtrail observers note that chemtrails are often laid down at the
leading edge of approaching frontal systems. While rare "sundogs" form
ice-crystal circles around the Sun in advance of strong winds, much more
common "chemdogs" create prismatic solar halos during stable weather.
More and more observers, like this Vancouver resident, wonder why "on the
days of heavy spraying you will notice a rainbow around the Sun". Many more
people who have been healthy all their lives wonder why they keep getting
desperately sick whenever the chemplanes appear.
Unlike the refined aluminum in cooking utensils that is tenuously linked to
Alzheimer's disease, aluminum oxide is as inert as sand and is not
considered toxic.
But in a story headlined "Tiny particles can kill", the August 5, 2000,
edition of New Scientist reported that "city-dwellers in Europe and the US
are dying young because of microscopic particles in the air".
Looking at byproducts of hydrocarbon burning, a Harvard School of Public
Health team determined particulates with a diameter less than 10 microns as
being a serious threat to public health. (A human hair is about 100 microns
across.) In 1987, US environmental regulations limited airborne
concentrations of particles less than 10 microns in diameter.
But air pollution has grown worse. On April 21, 2001, the New York Times
warned: "These microscopic motes are able to infiltrate the tiniest
compartments in the lungs and pass readily into the bloodstream, and have
been most strongly tied to illness and early death, particularly in people
who are already susceptible to respiratory problems."
David Hawkins, a lawyer for the Natural Resources Defense Council, speaks
for "about a quarter-million Americans who have died prematurely as result
of fine-particle exposure".
That number may be boosted sharply by chemtrail spraying. On December 14,
2000, the New England Journal of Medicine reported that inhaling
particulate matter of a size 10 microns or smaller leads to "a 5% increased
death rate within 24 hours".
Teller's sunscreen calls for spraying 10 million tons of talcum-fine
reflective particulates of 10 to 100 micron sizes.
Allergic reactions to airborne fallout do not explain the entire syndrome
of chemtrail-related illness. Falling blood temperatures accompanying
symptoms of intense yet feverless "flu" is a classic sign of chronic fungal
infection. Blamed for a host of auto-immune dysfunction, from chronic
fatigue to fibromyalgia and multiple sclerosis, the fungus within us also
signals its presence in sharp joint pain, sudden extreme fatigue, sudden
dizziness, mental confusion and short-term memory loss.
After nearly three years of intense investigation, I have found no proof
that chemtrails constitute a deliberate biological attack. Research for my
books on the Gulf biowar and earlier germ warfare experiments (Bringing The
War Home; Scorched Earth) show that bio-attacks are conducted at low level
and never in daylight, in order to avoid ultraviolet sterilisation of
toxins.
The biohazards in chemtrails may be bad LUC. The "Law of Unintended
Consequences" states that every human intervention creates unpredictable
consequences. Chemtrails can cause drought by soaking up all available
moisture, and drooping chemical curtains fall through vast colonies of
UV-mutated bacteria, viruses and fungi living in the upper atmosphere.
Could these malevolent micro-organisms be piggy-backing on the plumes?
A series of balloon flights made in the US during the 1960s collected
startling stratospheric samples swarming with bacteria and fungi as well as
viruses bigger than any known at the time.
If viruses fall from the sky, most would land in the sea. Dipping their
beakers into coastal seawater, scientists found as many as 10 million large
virus-like particles per quart. As one researcher said: "No one knows where
they come from or what they do. Their size and shape match the virus-like
particles found in the upper atmosphere."
Other life-forms, even tinier than bacteria, are also thriving in our
atmosphere. The discoverer of nanobacteria, Dr Robert Folk, describes the
most populous organisms on Earth as "dwarf forms of bacteria, about
one-tenth the diameter and 1/1000th the volume of ordinary bacteria".
The Professor Emeritus at the University of Texas figures that these
ultra-tiny bugs are "possibly an order of magnitude more abundant" than
normal bacteria that swarm everywhere.
Since chemtrails are commonly spread over populated areas where temperature
differentials are greatest and solar shading most needed, it is probable
that particulate-laden plumes are precipitating airborne viruses, bacteria
and fungi down into human lungs and respiratory systems unable to recognise
or resist the alien invaders.
This possibility was further strengthened when Dr Folk chose a lightweight
metal as a matrix to grow bugs too small to be seen by optical microscopes.
Folk viewed under electronic magnification entire ecologies of swarming
nanobac. The bacteria were feasting on (he called it "metabolising")
aluminum.
PUBLIC CONCERN SPREADS
Are we worried yet? An August 2001 WorldNetDaily poll asked Americans: "Do
you think 'chemtrails' are anything to worry about?" Forty-three per cent
answered "Yes"; another 30 per cent wanted more information on
chemtrails--a total 73 per cent of US respondents concerned about
chemtrails.
As lawyers across the US discuss filing the "Mother of All Lawsuits"
against Boeing, Bush and the US Air Force, their case now appears tight
enough to force further disclosures. The last glaring evidential
gap--photos of ground-based chemtrail operations--may soon be forthcoming.
What to do?
A British campaigner involved in another bid to reclaim individual
sovereignty and local autonomy held out the best hope for change when she
told a CBC radio interviewer: "The only way to get government to do
anything is if enough people stand up and shout, 'This is ridiculous!'"
Stay tuned. With chemtrails confirmed as a military operation aimed at
climate modification, the biggest trial is about to begin--in the court of
public opinion.
References:
Vancouver Courier chemtrails coverage:
http://www.vancourier.com/085101/news/085101nn1.html
WorldNetDaily chemtrails coverage:
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=24152
Mark Steadham's Houston contrails study:
http://www.chemtrailcentral.com/report.shtml
"Tiny Bits of Soot Tied to Illness", New York Times, April 21, 2001,
http://www.nytimes.com/ 2001/04/21/science/21AIR.html
NOAA meteorologist Thomas Schlatter:
http://www.weatherwise.org/qr/qry.chemtrail.html
More from William Thomas at http://www.lifeboatnews.com
--- End Message ---
