|
Hugh (in particular) - did you ever come across the
news that two Japanese astrophysicists had detected the 'music of the spheres'
? I read it in 'New Scientist' a couple of years ago and have now
lost that issue but, in essence, these two were analysing the vibrations of
planet Earth. They gradually eliminated individual frequencies as they
assigned sources to each and eventually found that there remained one frequency
which apparently had no detectable source. They concluded that this is the
natural frequency of the planet, and that each celestial body has its own
characteristic frequency. This, to me, seems one of the most fundamental
validations for astrology - certainly worth quoting at those scoffers who
conveniently assume that the only influence such a body could have is by its
gravity, and thus 'demolish' astrology by showing that a passing vehicle
has a stronger local gravitational effect than the nearest planet.
It ties in with an assertion by
Dr Percy Seymour, a very brave professional astronomer who supports
astrology ('The scientific basis of astrology', Quantum Books, 1997),
that a foetus recognises the set of frequencies which define its
character and chooses to be born when external frequencies fit this - rather
than being defined by whichever set of frequencies happen to be vibrating at the
time of its birth. Makes one wonder what damage is being done by medical
intervention in the birth process
?
Tony N-S.
|
