from http://www.threefolding.freeuk.com/intro.htm

What is Social Threefolding?

Even a cursory examination of global societies reveals that they all 
have three functions or spheres of activity under which all other 
social activities can be subsumed:

cultural sphere
rights sphere
economic sphere

All three spheres are mutually interdependent and before we make 
conscious their functional differences and give each their dues are 
intermingled often in ways which make for an unhealthy body social.

By the 'cultural sphere' we mean that which enters human society 
through the unfettered exercising of human spiritual activity such as 
thinking, moral judgement and being creative. Here we include all the 
arts, scientific research, religion, education, invention and 
enterprise.

By the 'rights sphere' we mean all that human beings in a society -- 
local, national or global -- agree to as the fundamental rights 
between one another in all their interactions. This embraces 
lawmaking, governance and representation of the people and coincides 
with political life in its purest form.

By the 'economic sphere' we mean transformation of the products of 
nature into products suitable for use by human beings. Everything 
from the acquisition of the products of nature (e.g. mining, hunting) 
to farming, manufacturing, trade and end use (consumption) is part of 
this sphere.

To each of these three spheres belongs its proper Leitmotif or ideal:


*       cultural sphere -- freedom (Liberté)
*       rights sphere -- equity, equality (Egalité)
*       economic sphere -- brotherhood, solidarity (Fraternité)



In this functional differentiation of the three spheres lies the 
whole significance of threefolding the social organism. If the ideal 
of one sphere is misapplied in one of the others the social organism 
is rendered unhealthy. Three out of many examples will adequately 
illustrate this. If the rights sphere, the sphere of governance, 
determines the school curriculum, freedom in education is 
compromised. If freedom is assigned to the economic sphere, because 
of the the very nature of economic activity the most uncaring acts 
are perpetrated, usually against the weaker members of society. And, 
to take a more extreme but no less thinkable example, much of a 
society's capacity for wealth creation would be compromised if the 
use of the means of economic productivity -- land for instance -- 
were to be shared equally between all members of that society instead 
of assigning it to those best able to make good use of it.

In addition to the three fundamental functional differentiations of 
the social organism a whole complex of interrelations exists, just as 
in the individual human organism the activities of thinking, feeling 
and willing are interdependent.1 The economic sphere, which is 
nowadays increasingly global, needs its governance. The process of 
making laws requires the exercising of moral judgement. Indeed, the 
ideals embodied in laws arise out of the moral intuitions, the free 
spiritual activity, of individuals. Cultural life cannot survive 
without the gifts given to it that arise from the wealth created in 
economic life. One only has to think of education, research 
institutes or churches. Freedom in education or religion cannot 
flourish unless guaranteed as a right. Wealth creation needs the 
input of spiritually active, i.e. creative, individualities such as 
inventors or entrepreneurs. Many other interrelations could be added 
which singly or taken together do not compromise the functional 
differentiation of the three spheres.

This short essay serves only as an introduction to threefolding the 
social organism. The ideas put forward here are by themselves not new 
amongst certain thinkers about society. Indeed the mottoes Liberté, 
Egalité and Fraternité are easily recognisable as those which 
inspired the French Revolution. And there is more than a hint of the 
desirability of letting each sphere of the social organism manifest 
its proper ideal in Goethe's fairy tale The Green Snake and the 
Beautiful Lily in which he portrays 'mixed king' as weak. For a more 
thorough treatment of social threefolding please see the articles and 
books sections of this web site and above all Rudolf Steiner's book 
Towards Social Renewal (Rudolf Steiner Press, London, 1977)

Note

1. For an account of the threefold nature of the human being see Owen 
Barfield's The Case for Anthroposophy, Rudolf Steiner Press, 1970 
which contains a translation part of Rudolf Steiner's Von 
Seelenrätseln (1917, GA21). This translation is out of print, but the 
essential part can be found on Sune Nordwall's web site at 
http://hem.passagen.se/thebee/Steiner/workmaterial.htm

Reply via email to