----- Original Message ----- From: "Harry Love" <[email protected]> To: "Boulder-Denver Ruby Group" <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 8:25:45 PM GMT +00:00 Monrovia Subject: Re: [Boulder Ruby Group] Request for Non-Standard Ruby Webapp Architecture
> So far, security is the only reason given for the database-centric > architecture To quote Matthew Broderick as David Lightman in Wargames, "I don't believe any system is totally secure." And having worked with pl/pgsql for business logic in a Rails app, I can say I wouldn't wish the experience on anyone. I would push back haaaard. ..... I don't reply to many list emails these days, but I couldn't resist on this one... PL/PGSQL will do more harm in the long run, because no app is unchanging. Changes will start taking longer, needed fixes will start to be perceived as harder and put off. I agree with Harry, I wouldn't wish that on anyone. FYI, if you really are object oriented, database logic should be restricted to data restrictions, and not mingle with web code. D. Stimits, stimits AT comcast DOT net .... Harry -- Harry Love [email protected] http://harrylove.org/ http://twitter.com/harrylove m (720) 938-2486 _______________________________________________ Bdrg-members mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/bdrg-members
_______________________________________________ Bdrg-members mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/bdrg-members
