On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 11:51:03PM +0100, Gianluca Montecchi wrote: > On Friday 19 March 2010 23:46:16 W. Trevor King wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 11:18:15PM +0100, Gianluca Montecchi wrote: > > > On Friday 19 March 2010 12:38:06 W. Trevor King wrote: > > > > I agree with Ben. I've created a bug to keep track of our "wontfix" > > > > response though: > > > > > > Using something like the "raw_input" function ? > > > > What does that have to do with the default EDITOR? Perhaps you meant > > to reply to the Anton's utf-8 string bug (which is fixed in my branch > > anyway, no need for raw_input and such)? > > I am suggesting to use the raw_input if $EDITOR is not set, just to > avoid to return an error.
Ah, I see. That's certainly more reasonable than "default to vi". We already read from stdin (where raw_input would be getting it's information from), with be comment [options] ID - You're suggesting we also read from stdin if the '-' is missing? That's easy enough to do, I suppose. Should we also add similar behavior for the other "'-' for stdin" cases? be commit [options] - be import-xml [options] - be new [options] - -- This email may be signed or encrypted with GPG (http://www.gnupg.org). The GPG signature (if present) will be attached as 'signature.asc'. For more information, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy My public key is at http://www.physics.drexel.edu/~wking/pubkey.txt
pgplPgAFYLpBP.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Be-devel mailing list [email protected] http://void.printf.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/be-devel
